Reviewing
theater on The Morning After is ruining my life.
Saturday night, I saw
Jade Esteban Estrada in
"Chek It, Baby,"
a one-man gay cabaret which fancifully interprets the great Russian
playwright Anton Chekhov’s four masterpieces,
"The Seagull,"
"Uncle Vanya,"
"The Three Sisters," and
"The Cherry
Orchard," through the lens of a one-man gay cabaret.
It was the big opener to the 2008 Twin Cities Chekhov Festival, a
heroic theater weekend at the Byrant-Lake Bowl, featuring sixteen
theater companies “breathing new life into the work of Anton Chekhov
through inspired interpretations, inventive adaptations and original
multi-disciplinary performance.”
Okay, I really don’t have anything against
Estrada, whom the
Topeka Capitol-Journal calls “one of the finest American solo
theatre artists of the twenty-first century.” And I don’t have
anything against the other souls sitting in the Bryant-Lake Bowl’s
theater space, all of whom, based on where and when they laughed
during the show, must have been huge Chekhov freaks, and most of
whom, based on my extensive eavesdropping, spoke fluent Russian. No,
I’m just feeling sorry for myself for going to experimental gay
cabaret with millions of inside Chekhov jokes—and getting most of
them.
What the hell is happening to me?
Estrada came out to this techno
music, making these surreal hand gestures, with his hair waxed into
three dramatic spikes, a face full of clown makeup, flashing this
gigantic grin. It was like somebody crushed a handful of Adderall
into John Leguizamo’s applesauce. He started out by doing a skit
that re-set Chekhov’s "The Three
Sisters" on a "Maury"-esque
daytime talk show. I laughed at Natasha as an entitled lower-class
striver because people like her are actually on "Maury" all the time.
Answering Maury’s inquisition about her cuckolding of Andrei with
that specific brand of daytime defiance, “Well, if my husband
doesn’t care, I don’t see how it’s any of your business.” It was
genuinely funny. His evangelical interpretation of
"The Cherry
Orchard" had its moments and his coup de grace, in which he
casts extras for a Hollywood version of
"The
Seagull"
(starring Charo as Nena: “I am a seagull. Coochie, coochie!”),
well, it was ridiculous and funny (if not ridiculously funny).
So yeah, I enjoyed "Chek It, Baby." And I am profoundly
disturbed by this.
It’s pretty clear there is nobody with whom I will ever really share
a po-mo appreciation of Chekhov. I refuse to go combat boot,
pierce-my-face, theater-class-loony like half the crowd in there,
and unlike the other half, I’m not ready for my wild old Rooskie
phase yet, either. I mean, I get it. Chekhov doesn’t have the appeal
of an indie band. Or an Oscar-nominated movie. Or a great new
restaurant. I am going to end up deranged, laughing maniacally to
myself at (Estrada’s) John McCain-as-Lopakhin during late-night
experimental theater festivals.
One tear.
But, wait a minute. Check it out: of all the great
nineteenth-century Russian writers, Chekhov is the most relatable
to somebody that saw "There Will Be Blood," just bought the
new Vampire Weekend, and loves the cauliflower fritters at the 112.
Because Chekhov still works in a world where you can run across your
ex-girlfriend on Comedy Central. He’s been there before. He would’ve
laughed at me—because he laughed at himself, even when it sucked. He
wrote about dating artists, and he wrote about lazy writers, not to
mention selfish mothers, jackass supervisors, and absentminded
siblings, all people who surround us still. His characters are
real—realer than Shakespeare’s by far—and ready for today’s stage,
even if it’s late-night, one-man gay cabaret at the Bryant-Lake
Bowl.
So please don’t keep making me do this by myself. Chek is worth it.
Please.
©2008 Minneapolis-St. Paul Magazine